DOC
WEC-KB-026
CATEGORY
Troubleshooting
READ
~5 min
Technical Library · Troubleshooting

Rust on "Stainless"
Fasteners — Why?

Published 2026-06 Read time ~5 min Keyword rust on stainless
RELATED
304 vs 316 offshore Galvanic corrosion Corrosion categories
§ 01
Not rustproof
§ 02
How it fails
§ 03
Common causes
§ 04
Grade & environment
§ 05
Prevention

A common site complaint: "the bolts are stainless, but they're rusting." Stainless steel is not rust-proof — it is corrosion-resistant, and only as long as its protective passive layer stays intact. On a wind turbine, especially near the coast, several everyday factors can break that protection down.

§ 01  Stainless is not rust-proof

Stainless steel resists corrosion because chromium in the alloy forms a thin, self-healing passive oxide film on the surface. That film is what protects the steel — not the bulk metal itself. If the film is damaged faster than it can re-form, or if the environment is too aggressive for the grade, the underlying steel corrodes and you see rust on a part that is genuinely "stainless."

§ 02  How stainless actually fails

Rust on stainless usually takes one of a few recognisable forms:

  • Tea-staining — a brown cosmetic surface discolouration, common on 304 in coastal air. Often shallow, but a warning the grade is under-specified.
  • Pitting corrosion — localised deep pits where chlorides break through the passive film; far more dangerous than it looks because it concentrates stress.
  • Crevice corrosion — attack in tight gaps (under washers, in threads) where oxygen is depleted and the film cannot re-form.

§ 03  Common causes

Cause Mechanism Fix
Grade too low 304 in a chloride (coastal) environment Use 316/A4 or higher
Carbon-steel contamination Steel grinding dust / tooling embeds and rusts Segregate tools; passivate
Chloride pitting Salt exceeds grade's resistance Higher PREN grade (316 / duplex)
Crevice geometry Stagnant gaps, debris traps Design to drain; correct grade
Watch for contamination rust — Brown staining on new stainless is often not the stainless failing but embedded carbon-steel particles (from grinding nearby, or carbon-steel tools/brushes) rusting on the surface. It still must be cleaned and passivated, because it can initiate pitting in the stainless underneath.

§ 04  Grade and environment

The single most common root cause is simply specifying 304 (A2) where the chloride load demands 316 (A4) or better. The corrosion resistance of a grade is often summarised by its PREN (pitting resistance equivalent number) — 316 outperforms 304, and duplex grades outperform both. The full comparison is in 304 vs 316 stainless for offshore fasteners, and for the harshest sites, duplex / super duplex.

Matching grade to the site's corrosion category (C5/CX) is the structured way to avoid this mistake.

§ 05  Prevention and remediation

  • Specify the right grade for the corrosion category — 316/A4 minimum for coastal, duplex for splash/offshore.
  • Avoid cross-contamination — never use carbon-steel brushes or shared grinding tools on stainless; store separately.
  • Passivate after fabrication to restore the chromium-rich film.
  • Check galvanic pairing — stainless next to a less noble metal can accelerate attack; see preventing galvanic corrosion.

Existing tea-staining can usually be cleaned and passivated; deep pitting means the grade is wrong for the site and the fastener should be upgraded.

Seeing rust on stainless fasteners on a coastal or offshore turbine? We supply correctly graded 316/A4 and duplex fasteners matched to your corrosion category.
Request a Quote →
[1]ISO 3506: Stainless steel fasteners — mechanical properties [2]ASTM A967: Passivation of stainless steel parts [3]ISO 9223: Corrosivity categories [4]304 vs 316 stainless → [5]Duplex / super duplex →